From Unemployment to Retirement. Performing Artists in the French Social Protection System.
Finally, we carried out an unprecedented study of artistic retirement, grounded on the longitudinal analysis of specific administrative datasets specially built in collaboration with several social institutions of the entertainment industry. What does retirement mean – symbolically and economically – for an artist? We show that the specifically equipped flexibility artists experience (derogatory unemployment system taking into account the discontinuity of their employment agenda) implies tremendous economic inequalities and increasing economic difficulties when the age of retirement comes. Artists keep working as long as they can, not only because of the properties of their relationship to work, but also because they are urged to do so for economic reasons. But this incitation stumbles over the congestion of the labour market for elderly artists. So, the issue of their retirement cannot be envisaged independently from the evolutions of their labour market – which have been described as “unbalanced” (Menger 2005). In this dissertation, artists are considered as a limit case of the contemporary evolutions of work and employment statuses. The study of the way the specific rules of the social protection against unemployment artists benefit from articulate with the common rules of retirement they depend on constitute an invite to think about the implicit categories social protection systems are built on, their ability to adapt to the evolutions of employment statuses, and, more deeply, the case of artists invites us to operate an analytical return on the very notion of social protection “system”.