The End of EU Financial Regulatory Internationalism?
regulation. After delineating between two dimensions of internationalism –
integrationism and transnationalism – we report on our comparative study of 10
regulatory areas, over time and with respect to the US and international soft law.
Our evidence suggests that compared to 2007, the EU and the US in 2014 had
become less integrationist – though they have done so in a highly coordinated
fashion; and the EU, contrary to its image as portrayed by EU officials and scholars,
had also become less transnationalist, in contrast to the US becoming slightly more.
Using insights from the Historical Institutionalist turn in International Relations, we
attribute the EU’s declining internationalism in large part to changes in the
international institutional context (namely, membership expansion of regulatory
bodies and post-crisis selection of standard setters). Contrary to a long scholarly
tradition depicting internationalism as part of the EU’s institutional and cultural
DNA, our analysis indicates that as changes in the international context made it
harder, the EU became less of a financial regulatory internationalist.