Market Ethics with Trade in an Edgeworth Box
Although economics praises self-interest, even greed, as beneficial to the workings of the economy and society, many other social observers consider greed to be an immoral trait that would best be supplanted by altruistic behaviors. Because homo economicus is a cornerstone of the entire neoclassical paradigm, students that are new to economics, sometimes quickly infer that economic theory does not contain a moral compass. This paper confronts these perceptions by highlighting that in order for markets to function effectively it is critical that individuals adhere to several ethical constraints. These ethical principles are embedded in the assumptions of economic models and are often presented in the early economics literature, however, they are downplayed so much in introductory textbooks today that it is likely that most students leave their first courses with an unsatisfactory appreciation of the importance of ethics in economics. In a review of the top introductory microeconomics textbooks, it was found that none of the texts discuss what Coleman (1985) described as pre-market failures; namely failures in the ethical principles that underpin a functioning market and that are needed in order for perfectly competitive markets to even be possible.
This paper uses an Edgeworth box diagram to first highlight what are the foundational ethical principles of a pure exchange market; second, why adherence to this system of ethics enhances the effectiveness of the market; third, the limits of the homo economicus assumption and why market effectiveness requires restraints on self interested behavior; and fourth, the methods that have been employed, both private and public, to encourage ethical behavior and how they assist in maintaining market effectiveness.